|
|
Attorney at Law |
|||
|
Children's Right to Choose a Parent
By: Ed Adams l0/l9/09
Objective: The objective of this
article is to examine the legal and emotional
issues around children's right to choose with
which parent they prefer to live . This
generally occurs in most states at the age of
fourteen.
Summary: Many people believe that it is
absurd to allow children to decide where they
prefer to live, given that it is believed that
the child will pick the environment most suited
to giving in to his desires. Studies
demonstrate that this is not necessarily the
case, but that children will pick the home where
they feel the most secure--where the limits are
clear and protective of the child, as well as
predictable. This article puts forth a
discussion of the legalities and emotional
interplay when change of custody occurs by the
child's wish at the age allowed by each state.
The law in Georgia states: "In all custody
cases in which the child has reached the age of
fourteen years, the child shall have the right
to select the parent with whom he or she desires
to live. The child's selection shall be
controlling unless the parent so selected is
determined not to be a fit and proper person to
have the custody of the child."
In all custody cases in which the child has
reached the age of at least eleven and not
fourteen years, the court shall consider the
desires and educational needs of the child in
determining which parent shall have custody.
The child's selection shall not be controlling.
The Best Interest of the Child standard shall
apply.
In the case of the child that has reached the
age of fourteen the following applies: If after
an investigation it is determined that the
selected parent is fit, custody will be awarded
to that parent.
However, in the case of the child who is between
eleven and fourteen years of age, many factors
will be weighed in addition to the desires of
the child. These factors include the
educational opportunities, the ability to
provide for the child, and what home best serves
the "best interests of the child".
The welfare of a child is the most important
duty placed on society. History has shown that
it is beneficial to allow the child to have some
say in with whom his welfare should be placed.
All judges take the issue of custody very
seriously. Instead of believing that it is
absurd to consider the opinion of the child,
judges believe that the child's opinion is one
of the most valuable tools in deciding the issue
of custody.
By having a confidential conversation with the
child the judge can have a better understanding
of the true picture. It is easier to establish
the pros and cons of each living situation.
This makes the award of custody more than
guesswork. This does not rule out professional
custody evaluations. However, this article is
more centered on "changes of custody" as
children become older and have more input into
their own situations.
Therefore, children can and should be able to
participate in the determination of custody. It
helps them to lead a happier and more empowered
life as they know that the had input into their
own circumstances. It often helps the parents
as well, if handled properly.
One of the few good things about divorce is that
it creates an environment in which parents watch
each other. This often means better
circumstances for the child.
I had a case some years ago in which the father
was a dedicated dad. He spent his spare time
with his child, a boy, playing sports, going to
movies, and out to eat. They had a great time!
The marriage, unfortunately failed, and the
issue of custody arose. The child was fifteen
and chose to be with his mother. Everyone was
surprised, including me.
The reason the boy gave for his choice was that
his mother disciplined him and made him do his
homework. The father realized that he was being
a "pal" but not necessarily a "father". The
couple had an amicable divorce and both became
better parents. In summary, giving the child
input or the right of choice, can be beneficial
to everyone involved.
|
||||
| * | ||||