|
|
Attorney at Law |
|||
|
The End of Corporal Punishment As We Know It
By: Ed Adams l0/9/09
Objective: The objective of this article is to
high-light the changes in law and school
policies that have affected corporal punishment
for children.
Summary: While some corporal punishment is
still allowed, it is no longer fully protected
by law. This article presents a discussion of
the guidelines for the use of any corporal
punishment.
Corporal punishment is still being administered
in schools and in homes. Some people believe
that it is the only way to discipline children
when they are being unruly. However, the legal
allowable methods have changed drastically.
"Spare the rod, and spoil the child" ws not only
a catchy maxim, but a belief held by many people
in the l900's. Many instruments were used
including paddles, belts, rulers, and the ones I
feared most, the switches. I remember, not
fondly, having to cut my own switch for my
mother to use. Corporal punishment was accepted
and expected.
Schools were given the right to use corporal
punishment and did so on a regular basis.
Paddling was the preferred choice. Parochial
students may remember the rulers across the
knuckles administered by the nuns.
Whatever your feelings about corporal
punishment, most of these practices have now
been limited or prohibited.
Several state school boards have prohibited the
use of corporal punishment in government
schools. Private schools allow it but only with
the consent of the parents. Parents of course,
can continue to use corporal punishment as a
disciplinary tactic with certain cautions.
Most state laws make it a felony to maliciously
cause a child under the age of eighteen cruel or
excessive physical or mental pain. The old
practice of allowing parents or any person in
authority to cause bruising, welts, or other
physical marks is no longer being tolerated.
In addition, many states have adopted laws
making it a crime for care-givers such as
nurses, teachers, and doctors to avid reporting
suspected injuries to children. Also, if a
spouse is a witness to excessive punishment that
causes injuries, he or she has a duty to seek
medical treatment. If they do not do so they
can be charged with a crime.
I have noticed a large increase in the number of
cases that involve cruelty to children through
the use of excessive force. In my practice I am
representing a step-mother who is charged with
aggravated assault. She allegedly hit her
step-daughter with a yard stick, causing minor
bruising and a cut. The child complained to her
teacher and the authorities were called. In the
recent past, the pain inflicted would not have
warranted a legal charge to be filed. That has
now changed.
Many of us believe the saying, "spare the rod,
and spoil the child" is correct. People believe
that children need to be hit in order to gain
their attention and that the world would be
better if we held to this idea. That belief may
or may not be true. The fact remains that
excessive force is no longer tolerated in
today's society. Most people mean well when
they discipline their children. However, what
was once popular is now suspect. If you must
use corporal punishment, be careful that it is
within the legal limits.
|
||||
| * | ||||